Lean5Sigma Execution

“How would you do it?”
The question that changed everything.

Two senior consultants asked me to join a culture transformation at one of the Netherlands’ largest asset managers. Before I agreed, I asked them one question.

Robert“What do you actually want to achieve with our collaboration?”
Consultants“Take control together, bring in more consultants, and earn on volume.”

I asked how flooding an organization with external people would serve the client. Silence. Then they asked:

Consultants“OK Robert… how would you do it?”
Robert“Take only the 20% of tools that produce 80% of the results — and give them to the client’s own people.”

They agreed. One year later, the CEO said:

CEO“You achieved in one year what twenty consultants couldn’t accomplish in the two years before you.”
€21M
found by their own people
1 year
vs 2 years with 20 consultants
0
external consultants needed
Permanent
capability stays when we leave
See where the friction sits in your organization →
20 questions · 5 minutes · Free

The real reason programs fail

The consulting industry has a financial incentive to keep you dependent. There’s a better model.

Every year organizations spend millions on Lean Six Sigma consultants who deliver a report, present a roadmap, collect their fee — and leave. Six months later the results have evaporated and the same problems are back. Not because the methodology failed. Because nothing stayed inside.

More than 60% of Lean Six Sigma programs fail to meet their objectives. Other practitioners put the real number closer to 95% when you account for programs that fade once the consultants leave.

The tools aren’t the problem. Leadership is. It always is. When leaders aren’t aligned, when “improvement” is something consultants do while leaders watch — the program dies the moment the consultants leave.

There’s also the economics nobody talks about. The industry benchmark for a traditional Black Belt-led project is $175K–$300K in annual savings per project. One deployment. One organization’s own people. €21M identified. That’s 70–120x the industry benchmark. Using 20% of the tools.

60%+
programs fail to meet objectives
~95%
fade once consultants leave
70–120x
industry benchmark beaten

Their own people found it. Nobody told them to.

1,400-person technical services organization · Post-merger

€21M

annual savings identified by their own people — ~20% of yearly budget

1 year
To full deployment
0
External consultants
20%
Of tools used
~20x
Return in year one

Lean Six Sigma

20external consultants deployed
2 yrsof the program running
100%of tools taught
€0lasting results after they left

Lean5Sigma

0external consultants needed
1 yrto full deployment
20%of tools — the ones that work
€21Mfound by their own people

Before the engine — the measurement

The reason programs fail is always leadership. That’s where the scan starts.

The Leadership Friction Scan measures four dimensions of structural friction: bottleneck, silos, fixing, and playbook. Every failed improvement program has at least two of these running at high levels. Most organizations have never measured them.

In 5 minutes you’ll see whether your leadership structure is ready to run its own improvement engine — or whether the same pattern that kills consulting programs would kill this one too. Better to know before you invest.

Your people already know where the waste is. See what’s blocking them from fixing it.

20 questions. 5 minutes. Your primary friction pattern named — and the structural constraint that’s keeping your organization dependent on outside help.

Take the Leadership Friction Scan →
Free · No commitment · Results immediately